Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!CZHRZU1A.BITNET!K538915 From: K538915@CZHRZU1A.BITNET.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: Re:Binary newsgroups Message-ID: <8702251402.AA00125@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Wed, 25-Feb-87 09:33:01 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8702251402.AA00125 Posted: Wed Feb 25 09:33:01 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Feb-87 07:21:34 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 38 As a major distributer of a binary only program (BTW I have put source for other programs on the net (did anybody ever use the screensavers I posted)) I have some comments to one of the postings about the a binary/source newsgroup (beware we are NOT connected to UUCP so we don't pay the bills): Gene Spafford spaf@gatech.UUCP writes >1) Binary isn't retargetable. A bina.................................. >2) Binary isn't adaptable. If a ...................................... Right, but utilities of general interest (in C and with Unixlike system calls) belong on Mod.sources or Comp.sources.unix (in source!), Comp.sources.atari.st or what ever it will be called should be for Atari specific code. Adaptions of existing code (if in C) should be done where possible with ifdef's. Don't forget that a lot of stuff written for the ST is not in C, an example (the one I know best:-)): UniTerm Source + Utilities 400kB Pascal source, about 200kB very machine specific 100kB Small assembler routines (about 80kB fonts) 15kB Fonts in GEM format 10kB Font to assembler dumper ? Font editor >3) Binary isn't fixable. If a ....................................... True, but a longer discussion about this was on Comp.os.minix, there are good reasons not to distribute sources, particulary if you offer some kind of support. >4) Binary isn't verifiable. With all ................................ That's one of the things a moderator is for. Simon Poole K538915@CZHRZU1A.BITNET