Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!osu-eddie!osupyr!akw
From: akw@osupyr.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: News From Hannover Messe
Message-ID: <88@osupyr.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 10-Mar-87 21:43:22 EST
Article-I.D.: osupyr.88
Posted: Tue Mar 10 21:43:22 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Mar-87 20:39:12 EST
References: <1347@husc6.UUCP> <620@atari.UUCP>
Reply-To: akw@osupyr.UUCP (FarOff MicroDesigns)
Lines: 21

In article <620@atari.UUCP> leavens@atari.UUCP (Alex Leavens) writes:
>  There's been no final decision made on this--I think Leonard's comment
>about "Leaving this up to marketing types" was more of a hedge than an actual
>statement of intent.  At this point I think we want  your input.  How many
>of you _aren't_ going to upgrade to blitters, but still  want the ROMS?

I, for one, will be waiting with baited breath for the new ROMS and
the blitters, given price boundaries (will the upgrade be ~$50-70(US)
as the last ones were?) provided, of course, they are compatible with
my stock, vanilla 520ST.  

Alex, a related question...is/will Atari support/be supporting an official
RAM upgrade for us 512K owners (and those unfortunate 256K owners somewhere
in EurAsia with 260STs) now or anytime in the future?


	|					Andy Weaver
      --+-- 					akw%osupyr.uucp@cbatt.UUCP
	|   					The Ohio State University
	| Proverbs 25.25			1774 College Rd Cols, OH 43210
	|