Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!bacchus!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!styx!lll-lcc!ptsfa!pbhyc!jdf
From: jdf@pbhyc.UUCP (Jack Fine)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Is MS-DOS 3.2 full of bugs?
Message-ID: <611@pbhyc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Mar-87 12:16:30 EST
Article-I.D.: pbhyc.611
Posted: Fri Mar  6 12:16:30 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Mar-87 06:38:32 EST
References: <4818@shemp.ucla-cs.UCLA.EDU>
Reply-To: jdf@pbhyc.UUCP (Jack Fine)
Organization: Pacific * Bell, San Ramon, CA
Lines: 17

In article  wales@LOCUS.UCLA.EDU (Rich Wales) writes:
>. I mentioned the problem to a friend who is in the personal computer business.
>As soon as he heard me say "MS-DOS 3.2", he said that 3.2 was well known
>to be *so* full of bugs (including disk corruption problems!) that I'd
>be extremely well advised to "downgrade" my system to MS-DOS 3.1 as soon
>as I possibly could.

I too was concerned about DOS 3.2 and posted a similar question to the net
about 2 or 3 months ago.  I did not get any responses back that would
indicate any major problems.  Since then I have upgraded 9 10 meg pc-xts
one 20 meg pc-xt and a hardcard 20 on a clone to dos 3.2 with no problems
and in fact I kind of like the added features of 3.2 over even 3.1.  Let me
know if you (or anyone else ) have trouble with it.  I would like to be
forwarned if trouble is pending.

Jack