Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ptsfa!ihnp4!aluxp!revatt From: revatt@aluxp.UUCP (Robert S. Evatt) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: PCJR can it do cga (color graphics) Message-ID: <876@aluxp.UUCP> Date: Fri, 6-Mar-87 11:21:19 EST Article-I.D.: aluxp.876 Posted: Fri Mar 6 11:21:19 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 8-Mar-87 10:44:08 EST References: <1530@tekigm2.TEK.COM> Reply-To: revatt@aluxp.UUCP (52153-EVATT, ROBERT S) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ Lines: 33 In article <1530@tekigm2.TEK.COM> timothym@tekigm2.UUCP (Timothy D Margeson) writes: > >Both of these add ons seem to make the PCjr work almost as well as a PC. The >big exception is the throughput, the PCjr is slower than the PC by about 30%. > >No add ons I know of help the speed issue, short of changing the clock freq., >and I have not tried that to see if it can be done (the clock in a jr seems >to be used for many things besides running the CPU). > To the best of my knowledge, PROGRAMS RUNNING ENTIRELY IN EXPANSION MEMORY (>128K) should execute as fast or faster on the jr than on the 4.77MHz PC. There are two major impacts on speed with the jr: Throughput WILL be about 30% below the PC for execution in the bottom 128K because of contention between the display and the CPU for memory accesses. Filling the 128k with a ramdisk or memory resident programs or using the PCJRMEM.COM driver (supplied with IBM's memory expansion sidecars) with the /C switch will eliminate the competition for memory accesses. The other main hit is the lack of DMA. The only way around this are the RACORE units with DMA. ******************************************************************************** * Robert Evatt [ihnp4...]!aluxp!revatt * * AT&T Bell Labs (215)770-3570 * * Allentown, PA 18103 * ******************************************************************************** * usual disclaimers apply * ********************************************************************************