Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!crimmins
From: crimmins@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: IMS comments (long)
Message-ID: <174200046@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 11-Mar-87 13:28:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uxc.174200046
Posted: Wed Mar 11 13:28:00 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Mar-87 21:58:34 EST
References: <3082@vrdxhq.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:vrdxhq.UUCP:3082:uxc.cso.uiuc.edu:174200046:000:786
Nf-From: uxc.cso.uiuc.edu!crimmins    Mar 11 12:28:00 1987


/* Written 11:02 am  Mar  6, 1987 by bisanabi@vrdxhq.UUCP in uxc.cso.uiuc.edu:comp.sys.ibm.pc */
>
>Computer System : AT Clone (6/10 Mhz)
>                :  6 MHz - slower than 6 MHz IBM PC/AT -- Norton rates at 5.7
>                : 10 MHz - faster than 6 MHZ (obviously)- Norton rates at 10.3

Slower than a 6 MHz IBM PC/AT?  Norton rates a 6MHz IBM PC/AT at the same
speed, a 5.7 rating.  An 8 Mhz AT operates at a Norton rating of 7.7
Too bad those aren't *actual* speed increases as seen through *actual*
use.....

----
Dan Crimmins
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Computing Services Office - Micro Consulting Dept.

ARPA:	crimmins@uiucuxc.cso.uiuc.edu
BITNET:	crimmins@uiucuxc.bitnet
CSNET:	crimmins@uiucuxc.csnet
UUCP:	{ihnp4,pur-ee,convex}!uiucdcs!uiucuxc!crimmins