Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!mimsy!oddjob!gargoyle!sphinx!mobo From: mobo@sphinx.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans,comp.sys.ibm.pc Subject: Re: Novell Netware Serial Printers ? Message-ID: <1271@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> Date: Thu, 12-Mar-87 23:46:58 EST Article-I.D.: sphinx.1271 Posted: Thu Mar 12 23:46:58 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Mar-87 00:19:53 EST References: <292@aucs.UUCP> <1787@ubc-ean.UUCP> <4372@utah-cs.UUCP> Reply-To: mobo@sphinx.UUCP (Samuel Wilson) Distribution: world Organization: U Chicago Social Sciences Lines: 37 Keywords: XON/XOFF DTR SPOOLING NETWARE Xref: utgpu comp.dcom.lans:264 comp.sys.ibm.pc:2291 Summary: Now see non-dedicated 286 Netware In article <4372@utah-cs.UUCP> j-brown@CS.UTAH.EDU (Jeffrey L. Brown) writes: >In article <1787@ubc-ean.UUCP> lau@ubc-ean.UUCP (Etienne Lau) writes: >>In article <292@aucs.UUCP> wdw@aucs.UUCP (Bill Wilder) writes: > >>I can't help you with your problem, but I would like to know what you think of >>Netware 286. Specifically, what I want to know is, >>with Netware 286 and above boards, can you increase the local DOS size on the >>file server by moving all cacheing and etc above the 640 boundary. > >Our net at the college of law is using 286 v2.0a SFT Level 1. The file server >is a Sperry IT with 4M of memory and Novell's disk coprocessor controlling an >Adaptec 4070 RLL disk controller. The system has performed flawlessly now for >9 months, handling almost 60 networked PC's. >j-brown@cs.utah.edu And now check out a new Novell thing called Non-dedicated /286 Netware. It runs Netware in extended memory > 640K (we have a cheapo and highly recommendable board called a Chess-board with 4Meg in it). The DOS process [because if you scratch NOVELL too deeply you find unix] runs in real mode and the 640 stuff in protected mode. And it actually works. I have speedup.com, sidekick, carbon copy and a bunch of resident stuff running and the thing miraculously functions. And it goes even faster than a normal AT would: if you save a 1 meg file, it immediately claims that it is finished (caching the stuff in the 4 meg available) and waits for the processor to be idle, then switches to protected mode (presumably) and saves it. Now for the miracle of miracles. I PKXARC-ed a 4 meg archive that had been semi-trashed, and when it got to the trashed part, it hung the machine. I sat and pounded the keyboard for a while, filled the keyboard buffer and beeped for a while. But the disk was still flashing every once and a while. Nobody on the network knew that I had crashed the file server. I had crashed the process, and Netware was happily running away in protected mode. Samuel Wilson ..ihnp4!gargoyle!sphinx!mobo FOTMOBO@UCHMVS1.Bitnet University of Chicago, Division of Social Sciences