Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!houxm!houxa!grs
From: grs@houxa.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: is xenix unix....
Message-ID: <307@houxa.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 18-Feb-87 07:45:32 EST
Article-I.D.: houxa.307
Posted: Wed Feb 18 07:45:32 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 19-Feb-87 20:39:57 EST
References: <3108@gitpyr.gatech.EDU>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel
Lines: 26
Keywords: xenix, unix, pc/ix...
Summary: Try Multiport SysV

In article <3108@gitpyr.gatech.EDU>, eeproks@gitpyr.gatech.EDU (Ken Seefried iii) writes:
> 
> 
> I use (and love) unix on quite a few different machines.  The SV machines
> are primarily 3B1's, 3B2's and 3B20's.  I would like the machine that I 
> use at home to provide the same environment that I am use to at work.  Of 
> course,  this all has to be done on a budget.  IBM machines and clones are 
> cheap, BUT...
> 
> 1)  Is SCO and IBM Xenix the same as AT&T Unix System V.2.
>
Sorry to post this but my mail couldn't reach you.  Sys V Xenix was not ported
from SysV, it was derived from the older version of Xenix.  There are may 
differences between Xenix SysV and the SysV you find on ATT machines.  I use
Multiport SysV on a PC clone and find it to be almost identical to the SysV
I use at work on 3B20s, Vaxes and 3B2s.

It's drawbacks are mostly its lack of DOS support. (It should improve soon
with a Simula like product soon to be released.)  

Another big advantage is that it cost a fraction of what Xenix does!

	Glenn Sills
	BTL - Merrmack Valley 
	(617) 681-6437
	!houxa!grs