Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ucla-cs!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!icst-ecf.UUCP!cugini From: cugini@icst-ecf.UUCP.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.ai Subject: and another thing.. Message-ID: <8702100542.AA02467@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 9-Feb-87 08:59:00 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8702100542.AA02467 Posted: Mon Feb 9 08:59:00 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 11-Feb-87 05:47:53 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: "CUGINI, JOHN" Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 13 Approved: ailist@sri-stripe.arpa Yeah, while I'm at it, how do you, Harnad, know that two performances by two entities in question (a human and a robot) are relevantly similar? What is it precisely about the performances you intend to measure? How do you know that these are the important aspects? Refresh my memory if I'm wrong, but as I recall, the TTT was a kind of gestalt you'll-know-intelligent-behavior-when-you-see-it test. How is this different from looking at two brains and saying, yeah they look like the same kind of thing to me? John Cugini ------