Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!hplabsc!taylor
From: taylor@hplabsc.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.comp-soc
Subject: Re: Inquiry concerning misunderstandings arising from computer mail
Message-ID: <1288@hplabsc.HP.COM>
Date: Wed, 11-Feb-87 12:12:13 EST
Article-I.D.: hplabsc.1288
Posted: Wed Feb 11 12:12:13 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 12-Feb-87 19:34:01 EST
Sender: taylor@hplabsc.HP.COM
Distribution: world
Organization: EE/CS Deptartment, University of California, San Diego
Lines: 8
Approved: taylor@hplabs

I hope you'll post more on this topic, as I am interested, but it appears 
to me that everything you have said so far follows from the limited 
bandwidth of an e-mail message.  That is, since we have less material to 
interpret, we have a greater chance of a miscommunication.  (Perhaps I 
should have also added 'less redundancy'.)  'Is there more room for error 
in e-mail than in written mail?'  That's what I'd like to see addressed.

					Alex Glockner