Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!VIOLET.BERKELEY.EDU!mwm
From: mwm@VIOLET.BERKELEY.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.computers.68k
Subject: administrivia + explanation
Message-ID: <8702240152.AA12426@violet.berkeley.edu>
Date: Mon, 23-Feb-87 20:52:32 EST
Article-I.D.: violet.8702240152.AA12426
Posted: Mon Feb 23 20:52:32 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 26-Feb-87 21:36:08 EST
Sender: mwm@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 21
Approved: info-68k@ucbvax.berkeley.edu

It appear that may data about the behavior of
info-68k/mod.computers.68k was wrong. Everything is working exactly as
I wish it. The duplicate posting were in error. My apologies to all.

On the other hand, I recieved one note from a usenet reader asking me
not to crosspost comp.sys.m68k to info-68k. Since info-68k is an
ARPANet mail list, some of the readers (most notably those on BITNET)
may not have a chance to see comp.sys.m68k. As a service to them, I
will continue to forward pertinent articles to info-68k. This means
that those of you reading on netnews may have to read them twice.

As an alternative, I could arrange to gateway all info-68k to/from
comp.sys.m68k, and do away with mod.computers.68k. The last time this
was suggested, the readers of info-68k (who have the ultimate say)
either didn't care, or wished that it not happen. Does anyone out
there feel strongly about this one way or another?

	ucbvax!mwm
	mwm@berkeley.edu
	mwm@ucbjade.BITNET
	<mike