Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!LLL-ICDC.ARPA!oberman From: oberman@LLL-ICDC.ARPA.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax Subject: DEQNAs on the uVAX Message-ID: <8702210442.AA29407@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Fri, 20-Feb-87 14:30:00 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8702210442.AA29407 Posted: Fri Feb 20 14:30:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Feb-87 16:12:14 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: "Oberman, Kevin" Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 24 Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa >I am hoping to use a microVAX with two DEQNA ethernet interfaces to connect two >ethernets together; the microVAX will have full function routing DECNET and >will pass decnet messages between the two LANs. I cannot use a bridge in this >case, because of incompatibilities between other protocols in use on the two >seperate LANs. > >DEC at Colorado claims this configuration should work; so far I've been >unsuccessful. The second DEQNA does not autoconfigure; when I manually connect >it with SYSGEN, at the address and vector suggested by DEC at Colo, the system >bugchecks with an "unexpected system service exception" in NETACP when I try to >set the line state on in NCP. All I've gotten from DEC is "Hm...should >work..." Am I missing something obvious???? We have done it successfully. So it can be made to work. I have no idea why you are BUGCHECKing. We had to manually configure the unit with CSR, ADAPTER, etc. But it worked. I suggest you check the DEQNA manual to confirm the secondary DEQNA addressing information. And make sure 1 DEQNA is at the primary address and the other is at the secondary. R. Kevin Oberman LLNL arpa: oberman@lll-icdc.arpa (415) 422-6955 ------