Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!TRINCC.BITNET!TRIN7
From: TRIN7@TRINCC.BITNET.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: HSC controller performance info needed
Message-ID: <8702250113.AA18124@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 24-Feb-87 16:58:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8702250113.AA18124
Posted: Tue Feb 24 16:58:00 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Feb-87 04:23:47 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 22
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa

hello all,
 
O.K. I really appreciate all of the replies that I have been receiving.
 
I have another question.  This is much more specific.
 
Let's suppose we have a single CPU VAX machine (785,8600,etc..).
This machine is going to run a Database administrative package.
This package is going to rely on heavy DISK I/O.
Will there be significant performance differences if this machine has an
HSC controller?
Does it make sense for the type of application that the machine will be subject
to, to have the HSC controller?
 
Any help will be greatly appreciated as always.   thanks...
 
Scott Marshall
systems manager
Trinity College, CT.
BITNET: TRIN7@TRINCC
------