Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!EDDIE.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.music.gaffa
Subject: Excuse me?
Message-ID: <8702022137.AA09306@udenva.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Feb-87 16:37:20 EST
Article-I.D.: udenva.8702022137.AA09306
Posted: Mon Feb  2 16:37:20 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Feb-87 03:38:12 EST
Sender: daemon@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds
Organization: Love-Hounds Anonymous
Lines: 21
Approved: nessus@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: seismo!udenva!showard (Steve "Blore" Howard)

> [IED:] The same is true of Kate Bush: despite the undeniable
> importance of her innovations, it is the TIMELESS qualities of her
> music -- the magic of her muse, so to speak -- which give her art
> depth and lasting beauty. The innovations arise out of the needs of
> the muse, but they are not the muse herself.

  Excuse me?  I must not be reading this correctly.  How can you call
Kate Bush timeless?  Her earliest music is barely a decade old.

  An earlier posting prompts me to write, but--and let me make this
perfectly clear--ONLY IN JEST:  "Listening to Kate Bush is a lot like
staring at the sun--it's not a good idea."
-- 

"The laws of nature don't work if there's nobody looking"

Steve "Blore" Howard, Icon of Bad Taste
                      {hplabs, seismo}!hao!udenva!showard
or {boulder, cires, ucbvax!nbires, cisden}!udenva!showard