Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!EDDIE.MIT.EDU!Love-Hounds-request
From: Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.music.gaffa
Subject: Eno and discrete arguments
Message-ID: <8702191411.AA20344@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 19-Feb-87 09:11:41 EST
Article-I.D.: EDDIE.8702191411.AA20344
Posted: Thu Feb 19 09:11:41 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 20-Feb-87 06:40:34 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: Love-Hounds@EDDIE.MIT.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 15
Approved: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu

Really-From: nessus (Doug Alan)

> [Rob Rosen:] I merely stated that what others often mistake as
> intentional non-craftedness (excuse the clumsiness of the
> expression) is actually constructed carefully to give just that
> impression, and that Eno often constructs his music with that goal
> in mind; he has often issued statements to this effect in interviews
> and written essays.

So, you're accusing Eno of lying on his liner notes for *Discrete
Music*, where he explicitly states that the album was an exercise in
setting up a system and then letting it run with the tape recorder
going and no further intervention on his part?

			|>oug