Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!sdcsvax!darrell From: darrell@sdcsvax.UUCP Newsgroups: mod.os Subject: Re: Why no "real" distributed systems? Message-ID: <2721@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Date: Sat, 14-Feb-87 07:15:15 EST Article-I.D.: sdcsvax.2721 Posted: Sat Feb 14 07:15:15 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 15-Feb-87 05:36:41 EST Sender: darrell@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU Organization: The Boston Software Works, Inc. Lines: 28 Approved: mod-os@sdcsvax.uucp What about Apollo's OS (don't know its name)? What about Stanford's V system? I've never used either one, but from what I've read they both seem to be truly distributed. One could also argue that the VAX/VMS cluster facility also represents a distributed OS - it provides a truly transparently distributed file system. [ I would argue that calling Apollo's Domain a "distributed system" ] [ would be close to calling 4.3BSD a "distributed system." I must ] [ confess that I do not have an Apollo on which to base this -- ] [ it's just folk-lore. ] [ ] [ As for the V-System, I would call that a "distributed system," ] [ but it is an extremely experimental system from what I can gather ] [ from the papers. From what I have heard from folks who have used ] [ it, there is little or no protection for data. ] [ ] [ In summary, when I asked "Why are there no `real' distributed ] [ systems?", I was asking why aren't any commercially available? ] [ It is interesting that this discussion has evolved into the very ] [ appropriate question: "What is a distributed system anyhow?" ] [ ] [ --DL darrell@beowulf.ucsd.edu ] -- Larry Campbell The Boston Software Works, Inc. Internet: campbell@maynard.uucp 120 Fulton Street, Boston MA 02109 uucp: {alliant,wjh12}!maynard!campbell +1 617 367 6846 ARPA: campbell%maynard.uucp@harvisr.harvard.edu MCI: LCAMPBELL