Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!QUABBIN.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM!DCP
From: DCP@QUABBIN.SCRC.SYMBOLICS.COM.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Telnet Wish List
Message-ID: <870210101628.9.DCP@KOYAANISQATSI.S4CC.Symbolics.COM>
Date: Tue, 10-Feb-87 10:16:00 EST
Article-I.D.: KOYAANIS.870210101628.9.DCP
Posted: Tue Feb 10 10:16:00 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Feb-87 07:46:39 EST
References: <8702100550.AA27790@emory.eu>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 13
Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa


    Date: Tue, 10 Feb 87 00:50:20 EST
    From: Ken Mandelberg <km@EMORY.ARPA>

    One specific point for comment is the advisability of telnet instead of
    rlogin. Can a well implemented telnet work as well as rlogin? Is the
    rlogin protocol documented, or is the protocol just what the code
    does?

Yearly TELNET flame: TELNET is a piece of junk designed for ASR33s and
later tried to get improved as terminals entered a more modern age.  Use
SUPDUP (RFC 734).  If you also want to do graphics, see the SUPDUP
graphics protocol (RFC 746).