Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!cae780!amdcad!sun!imagen!jay From: jay@imagen.UUCP Newsgroups: news.software.b,misc.legal Subject: Re: Copyright status of the netnews software Message-ID: <940@imagen.UUCP> Date: Mon, 2-Mar-87 22:51:57 EST Article-I.D.: imagen.940 Posted: Mon Mar 2 22:51:57 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 5-Mar-87 20:47:16 EST References: <962@osiris.UUCP> <1717@hoptoad.uucp> <43093@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV> <1625@kitty.UUCP> Organization: Imagen Corp., Santa Clara CA Lines: 27 Xref: utgpu news.software.b:338 misc.legal:705 Summary: Perhaps preventing commercial plundering of public domain software? In article <1625@kitty.UUCP>, larry@kitty.UUCP (Larry Lippman) writes: -> [ Summary: Brian Reid, d/b/a mumble mumble, is wasting his time and -> money copyrighting USENET sofware for the good of the USENET -> community, since it's prohibitively troublesome and expensive to -> take legal action to protect one's copyrights anyway . . . -- j.j. ] -> . . . -> -> Please bear in mind that I am neither putting down nor flaming -> either Brian Reid or Rick Adams; I believe they did what they genuinely felt -> was in the best interests of the USENET community. However, I feel that any -> effort expended in making any copyright attempt for this purpose is wasted. But doesn't the existence of this copyright preclude any big greedy commercial software vendor from plagiarizing the code and selling it under its own copyright and enforcing that copyright, which might otherwise happen if Brian hadn't created the above-discussed copyright? I wonder if maybe that is what Brian had in mind? (The point is, Big Greedy Company could plagiarize if Brian can't afford to protect his rights -- but this way, if Big Greedy Company tried to enforce _its_ claimed copyright, it wouldn't have a leg to stand on.) -- -- From the alternate universe . . . -- Jay ...{sun,decwrl,ucbvax}!imagen!jay