Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!stargate!stargate From: stargate@stargate.UUCP Newsgroups: news.stargate Subject: response to questions about Stargate Experimental Subscriptions Message-ID: <102@stargate.UUCP> Date: Sun, 22-Feb-87 21:39:14 EST Article-I.D.: stargate.102 Posted: Sun Feb 22 21:39:14 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 23-Feb-87 05:40:17 EST Sender: mark@stargate.UUCP Lines: 167 The most important thing to note is that this initial phase of subscription availability to Stargate is an experiment. Some of the issues related to a future production service are impossible to define fully until after we have experience with a reasonable-sized experimental subscriber base in day-to-day operations. At this stage, the subscribers we're looking for are organizations who feel that it would interesting, useful, or even just plain fun to participate in the early stages of a unique operation that is forging considerable new ground in a number of areas. Initially SIS plans to transmit virtually all of the available moderated Usenet newsgroups and possibly some other moderated materials from non-Usenet sources. As the volume of non-moderated material on Usenet has continued to grow explosively, and the overall quality in many unmoderated groups has continued to decline, it has become increasingly obvious that moderated groups (which are continuing to grow rapidly in popularity) are the most appropriate material for broadcast at this stage. We are carrying only moderated newsgroups since that's the only reasonable manner in which we can ensure quality and manage our transmission bandwidth. The unmoderated groups for which there is demand also tend to be of very high volume and difficult for people to keep up with. We're working on plans for future additional services (e.g. highlights of unmoderated groups and the creation of more moderated groups) over Stargate as well. Overall, Usenet netnews is just the starting point for the sorts of services we plan to provide--we are looking at a wide variety of information sources as potential candidates for Stargate transmission. Since we have very limited financial resources with which to operate during this experimental period, SIS is not currently incorporated. We are attempting to keep our expenses (and thusly subscription fees) to an absolute minimum--and incorporation just does not make sense during this early experimental phase. SIS currently exists as a sole proprietership, in the name of the SIS business manager, Steve Morenberg. Incorporation will occur when feasible. The issue of profit vs. non-profit corporations is considerably more complex than it at first appears. Creating a non-profit corporation introduces a significant number of restrictions that could potentially impact services in a negative manner (for example, non-competitive issues may prevent the offering of useful services by a non-profit entity that could be provided by a for-profit entity). There are also considerable complications in day-to-day operations, bookeeping, etc. involved in non-profit status. On the other hand, many firms which are "for-profit" make little profit (or even none). It may well be the case that from the standpoint of services, complexity, etc. it would be easiest to be "for-profit" but to still hold fees and rates as low as possible. We are currently investigating the details of the "profit vs. non-profit" issues--no decisions have been made as of yet. But our goal remains the same in either case--to keep the services being offered priced as fairly and reasonably as possible. Regarding transmitted material copyrights--transmissions from a system like Stargate are best viewed as a "compilation" work. Ultimately, some of the material will come from public sources (such as Usenet) and other material may be locally originated by Stargate or other entities. Regardless of origin, material broadcast through a communications channel "not meant for reception by the general public" (which is the category Stargate is in) can be protected through a number of mechanisms, including contractual agreement with subscribers. In particular, we want to be as flexible as possible about the use of Usenet newsgroups being transmitted by Stargate. However, we do have some contraints. We will ultimately be paying fees for our satellite time based on the number of subscribers, and we need to have a significant number of paying subscribers to maintain the feasibility of the system--it is not economically practical to maintain a satellite system if only a few sites subscribed to the system and they simply passed material around via dialup to many other sites. The assumption with Stargate is that most sites with the capability of receiving materials directly from the WTBS data feed will want to do so. One of the important advantages of this is the receiving of materials simultaneously with all other subscribers, with none of the latencies or other problems associated with connection-based systems for distributing articles. Since each subscribing site has virtually a direct, continuous, and simultaneous link with the central node, the ability of Stargate to provide information on a timely basis is unsurpassed. We realize that some sites will be unable for technical reasons to tie-in directly with the WTBS-based system. We are working on plans to allow those sites to receive materials from other sites that do subscribe directly to Stargate, with a fee schedule adjusted to take this situation into account. Of course, in the long run the amount of information being sent by Stargate may be so large that such "non-direct" sites would be unable to receive all materials, and of course such sites will also be receiving all materials later than direct subscribers, reducing their ability to participate in discussions in a timely manner. We need to encourage as many sites as possible to directly subscribe to Stargate to encourage the viability of the network and the lowest overall fees possible. However, for those situations where a subscriber site wishes to feed portions of the Stargate data stream to another site which is unable to subscribe directly itself, we will attempt whenever possible to reach an amicable agreement under which this can be done and still maintain the overall viability of the satellite distribution system which is the primary modality of the network. Part of the purpose of the experimental subscription period is to help give us time to judge the sorts of arrangements, subcriber relationships, etc. that need to be established to help everyone get the most benefit possible from Stargate at the lowest possible costs. About equipment. There are two (eventually an optional third) pieces of equipment involved with Stargate: 1) The data decoder. This is a highly specialized LSI-based device which extracts, slices, and decodes data from the video signal at very high video speeds. It uses a proprietary protocol (held proprietary by the manufacturer to protect their years of R&D work) and would be exceptionally difficult to duplicate. We must arrange for the setup, addressing, and delivery of this decoder for subscribers. 2) The cable-TV demodulator. This is NOT the same thing as the typical boxes your local cable-TV company provides to you at home. Normal cable-TV boxes are strictly RF to RF units. The Stargate data demod must output carefully controlled baseband video. We have found a relatively inexpensive demodulator that meets the required tight specifications of video output filtering, baseband performance, and other parameters that are required to achieve good performance with the data decoder. Testing has also indicated that many other demods do NOT meet the required specifications. Since our demod and decoder have been tested with each other for proper operation, we cannot assure reasonable performance with subscriber-provided demod equipment. While we can't force everyone to use our demod, we strongly urge its acceptance as the best match for the job at hand. 3) The buffer box. In the future, we plan to make an optional "buffer box" available to subscribers who would like to offload the direct Stargate data stream from their host computers. This inexpensive 68000-based computer would be quite difficult to duplicate in functionality for less money than our price, since it is being mass-produced. However, no subscriber will be forced to buy or use the buffer box, and if a subscriber wishes to use their own equipment and software (e.g. some other dedicated micro, etc.) to buffer the data coming from the Stargate decoder they will of course be free to do so. We believe, however, that many sites will not need any such buffering equipment, since they will achieve good performance with a direct hookup from the Stargate decoder to their host computers. It is not possible at this time for us to announce "production phase" rates for service after the experimental period. These will depend on the number of subscribers and the success of the experimental phase. However, it is our goal that the production fees fall into the same basic range as the experimental fees. If anyone has any further questions about any of the above, please feel free to contact us directly at: stargate-query@Stargate.COM (if you understand domains) cbosgd!stargate!stargate-query@seismo.css.gov (for ARPANET hosts that don't conform to RFC 973/974) cbosgd!stargate!stargate-query (if you can get to cbosgd with bangs from UUCP) Thank you. The Stargate Team