Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!ptsfa!lll-lcc!seismo!mcvax!ukc!stl!dww From: dww@stl.UUCP Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin,news.sysadmin Subject: Re: Call for one LESS group - news.admin vs news.sysadmin Message-ID: <499@u410a.stl.stc.co.uk> Date: Wed, 25-Feb-87 05:34:04 EST Article-I.D.: u410a.499 Posted: Wed Feb 25 05:34:04 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 2-Mar-87 21:47:17 EST References: <487@u410a.stl.stc.co.uk> Reply-To: dww@stl.UUCP (David Wright) Distribution: world Organization: STL,Harlow,UK. Lines: 14 Xref: utgpu news.groups:465 news.admin:179 news.sysadmin:53 Ten days ago I posted an article to news.groups proposing that, since they usually contain the same postings and mostly have the same readers, the two admin groups be combined into one. Since then I have had one mail message in favour and one against. While I still think it is pointless having two groups when only one is needed, the level of interest in this question clearly does not justify taking any action. Looks like those who say it's almost impossible to get rid of a group by democratic means are right. Pity; it makes it harder to argue for new groups when they are needed. -- Regards, David Wright STL, London Road, Harlow, Essex CM17 9NA, U.K. dww@stl.stc.co.uk ...seismo!mcvax!ukc!stl!dww PSI%234237100122::DWW