Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!moncskermit!basser!elecvax!elec70b!agsm!bobm From: bobm@agsm.unsw.oz Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: How good is Empress? Message-ID: <449@agsm.unsw.oz> Date: Wed, 18-Mar-87 08:07:37 EST Article-I.D.: agsm.449 Posted: Wed Mar 18 08:07:37 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 21-Mar-87 03:07:59 EST Organization: Australian Graduate School of Management Lines: 29 We are considering acquiring a database language to operate on a Vax 11/780 under System 5.2.2. The requirements are that it be used for a mailing list database, in which there are about 1000 records of up to 10 fields per record, which will be used to quickly extract such data as number of records described by a logical combination of fields, and specific fields, such as addresses or telephone numbers. We also run student records, which include information on enquiring, applying, and enrolled students. For enrolled students, we need to keep grades by course, in such a way that we can quickly see whether a student has fulfilled distribution requirements, or can easily select the poorest or best students, by GPA. I have been following this newsgroup (and its forerunner) for some time, but have rarely seen reference to Mistress/Empress, which has been highly recommended. What experience have users had with Empress? How does it stack up against the better known databases (Ingres, Informix), given our needs? Any comments? I'll post if worthwhile. Thanks in advance, Robert MARKS, Australian Graduate School of Management, University of New South Wales, PO Box 1, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia. PHONE: +61 2 662-0271 ACSnet:bobm@agsm.unsw.oz ARPA: bobm%agsm.unsw.oz@seismo.CSS.GOV JANET: agsm.unsw.oz!bobm@ukc CSNET: bobm%agsm.unsw.oz.au@australia BITNET: bobm%agsm.unsw.oz%seismo.CSS.GOV@WISCVM BITNET: bobm%agsm.unsw.oz%seismo.CSS.GOV@HARVUNXT UUCP: {seismo,hplabs,ukc,mcvax,ubc-vision,nttlab}!munnari!agsm.unsw.oz!bobm {decvax,vax135}!mulga!agsm.unsw.oz!bobm