Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ucla-cs!ames!oliveb!jerry From: jerry@oliveb.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Subject: Question on using thin ethernet Message-ID: <740@oliveb.UUCP> Date: Tue, 31-Mar-87 21:15:25 EST Article-I.D.: oliveb.740 Posted: Tue Mar 31 21:15:25 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 3-Apr-87 06:36:53 EST Organization: Olivetti ATC; Cupertino, Ca Lines: 52 Keywords: thin ethernet multiport backbone I am faced with the prospect of cabling our building for an Ethernet LAN, mostly to connect PCs to our central computers. The building is small enough that cable distance is not a consideration. My first proposal was to use a thick ethernet backbone running from floor to floor and between the two wings. I would then use a "Thinwire Multiport Repeater" like the DEC DEMPR to cable out to the work stations. (The DEMPR has connections for 8 thinwire cables and a tranceiver.) A repeater would then connect the backbone to the computer room ethernet, isolating it from cabling faults. Thin to WS Thin to WS Thin to WS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DEMPR DEMPR DEMPR | | | ===================================================== Thick Backbone | REPEATER | ============================== Existing Computer Room Ethernet It just struck me that a cheaper configuration is possible. If I use one of the DEMPR's thin segments to connect the repeaters to each other then I save the cost of the repeater, thick cable, and 4 tranceivers. DEMPR Thin Cable DEMPR | | | | | |________________ ______________| | | | | | Thin to WS | | Thin to WS | Thin to WS| | | | | | | | DEMPR | ============================== Existing Computer Room Ethernet The building distances are well within the 185 meter limit on thin ethernet. The DEMPR provides the same isolation that a repeater would and counts as a repeater for purposes of delay. One disadvantage I can see is that each DEMPR will only support 203 (29x7) WS instead of 232. Big deal. More significant is that there are 3 "repeaters" instead of 2 for WS to WS comunication. (Unfortunately a built in terminator prevents connecting the central DEMPR with a T connector.) Has anyone ever tried something like this? Are there problems I havn't thought of? Jerry Aguirre Systems Administration Olivetti ATC