Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU!fair
From: fair@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans,comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: X.25, X.31 vs Q.921/Q.921 and Networking Style in General
Message-ID: <17977@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Mon, 23-Mar-87 08:20:42 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.17977
Posted: Mon Mar 23 08:20:42 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 25-Mar-87 01:48:46 EST
References: <363@bacchus.MIT.EDU>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The Michael A. Padlipsky Fan Club
Lines: 6
Xref: utgpu comp.dcom.lans:292 comp.dcom.modems:374

Do the obvious thing: chuck it all and use the DoD Internet Protocol
suite for this application. It is certainly clear that you need some
sort of transport that makes no assumption about the reliability of
the data link layers, and the X.* stuff doesn't seem to qualify.

	Erik E. Fair	ucbvax!fair	fair@ucbarpa.berkeley.edu