Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!aramis!lear
From: lear@aramis.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: GNU and sex
Message-ID: <370@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Tue, 24-Mar-87 20:26:00 EST
Article-I.D.: aramis.370
Posted: Tue Mar 24 20:26:00 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 26-Mar-87 04:45:14 EST
References: <1028@rpics.RPI.EDU> <1049@h.cs.cmu.edu>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 16
Keywords: emacs sex
To: rfb@h.cs.cmu.edu

I, for one, consider "NOT putting sex.1 in the distribution is
censorship" an invalid argument.  After all, there are a lot of
other files that are not in the distribution.  Why aren't we putting
the News software in the GNU distribution??  Why not include kermit???
By not including any given piece of software, does that imply
censorship?  Come on, guys!  Lighten up!  I suppose that requesting
that you people move this discussion elsewhere would be considered
censorship too.  This argument has churned out fast ammounts of
flamage over a silly text file that serves no useful purpose in life.

						...eliot
---
Anyone who disagrees with this opinion should check out the -1 option
in sex.1.
[lear@rutgers.rutgers.edu]
[{harvard|pyrnj|seismo|ihnp4}!rutgers!lear]