Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!bacchus!rlk
From: rlk@bacchus.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: GNU and sex
Message-ID: <369@bacchus.MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 25-Mar-87 12:10:46 EST
Article-I.D.: bacchus.369
Posted: Wed Mar 25 12:10:46 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Mar-87 01:35:06 EST
Sender: daemon@bacchus.MIT.EDU
Reply-To: rlk@athena.MIT.EDU
Organization: MIT Project Athena
Lines: 14

Well, as long as we're on this silliness, let me put my own two cents
in:

I thought for a while that including sex.1 was a fairly pointless
thing to do, and probably not an extremely winning idea.  But it
struck me that I've seen something similar with a non-free software
package that's getting quite a lot of play around here.  The manual
for that package thanked god or something like that.

If people who distribute non-free software can put their own bogosity
in, than why can't those of us who prefer free software do the same
thing?

Robert^Z