Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!h.cs.cmu.edu!rfb
From: rfb@h.cs.cmu.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: GNU and sex
Message-ID: <1050@h.cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 25-Mar-87 08:58:31 EST
Article-I.D.: h.1050
Posted: Wed Mar 25 08:58:31 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Mar-87 01:52:28 EST
References: <1028@rpics.RPI.EDU> <1049@h.cs.cmu.edu> <370@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU>
Organization: Carnegie-Mellon University, CS/RI
Lines: 28
Keywords: emacs sex

In article <370@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU> lear@aramis.RUTGERS.EDU (eliot lear) writes:
>I, for one, consider "NOT putting sex.1 in the distribution is
>censorship" an invalid argument.

I quit agree.  Of course, I never made that argument.

I too feel that sex.1 does not belong in the GNU Emacs distribution because
it is not related to GNU Emacs.  My last message was a direct response to an
attitude toward censorship which I felt was a dangerous one, i.e. that
censorship is called for when the subject matter is offensive.

The closing paragraph was simply an attempt to point out that the issue of
whether or not sex.1 belongs in the distribution is hardly important enough
to warrant this discussion.
--
Rick Busdiecker				Rick.Busdiecker@H.Cs.Cmu.Edu
Carnegie-Mellon University		seismo!cmucspt!rfb
The Robitics Institute			
Schenley Park				914 South Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213		Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania 15221
(412) 268-7663	[CMU-Pond]		(412) 242-6364
-- 
Rick Busdiecker				Rick.Busdiecker@H.Cs.Cmu.Edu
Carnegie-Mellon University		seismo!cmucspt!rfb
The Robitics Institute			
Schenley Park				914 South Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213		Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania 15221
(412) 268-7663	[CMU-Pond]		(412) 242-6364