Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!mcvax!enea!kuling!andersa
From: andersa@kuling.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.emacs
Subject: Re: comp.os.gnu
Message-ID: <183@kuling.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 6-Apr-87 20:00:43 EST
Article-I.D.: kuling.183
Posted: Mon Apr  6 20:00:43 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Apr-87 03:22:59 EST
References: <1311@msudoc.UUCP> <944@obelix.UUCP>
Reply-To: andersa@kuling.UUCP (Anders Andersson)
Distribution: world
Organization: Uppsala University, Sweden
Lines: 13
Keywords: comp.os.gnu, comp.lang.gcc

In article <944@obelix.UUCP> pekka-r@obelix.UUCP (Pekka Akselin) writes:
>I wote for comp.lang.gcc too.

Hmm, I've got the impression that gcc is a C *compiler*, not a new
*language*, right? Thus I think your suggestion for a name is a little
inappropriate. Maybe comp.compilers.gcc (there is a mod.compilers.* tree
right now), comp.os.gnu.gcc or *perhaps* comp.lang.c.gcc? Anyway, let's
take one group at a time. When gcc details start to clobber up either
comp.lang.c or comp.os.gnu, then it's time to think of creating a subgroup.
-- 
Anders Andersson, Dept. of Computer Systems, Uppsala University, Sweden
Phone: +46 18 183170
UUCP: andersa@kuling.UUCP (...!{seismo,mcvax}!enea!kuling!andersa)