Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!panda!teddy!jpn
From: jpn@teddy.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: String Handling and run-time libraries
Message-ID: <3928@teddy.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Apr-87 15:54:35 EST
Article-I.D.: teddy.3928
Posted: Wed Apr  8 15:54:35 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Apr-87 07:41:16 EST
References: <15292@amdcad.UUCP> <978@ames.UUCP> <15694@sun.uucp> <6042@mimsy.UUCP> <287@pembina.alberta.UUCP> <16014@sun.uucp>
Reply-To: jpn@teddy.UUCP (John P. Nelson)
Organization: GenRad, Inc., Concord, Mass.
Lines: 15
Xref: utgpu comp.arch:815 comp.lang.c:1523

In article <16014@sun.uucp> guy@sun.UUCP (Guy Harris) writes:
>This does not follow at all.  The SVID does not describe shared
>libraries; this is the correct thing for it to do, since there may be
>machines out there for which shared libraries are difficult to
>implement.  If we do shared libraries, it won't be because of the
>SVID.

Please, do the shared libraries ANYWAY!  Pretty Please?

I'm TIRED of Megabyte sized SUN executables.  And linking several tasks
together into a single executable (as recommended in the manuals) isn't
a solution, it's a hack.
.
.
.