Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!inuxc!inuxm!sdh
From: sdh@inuxm.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: Any good Pascals for CP/M2.2?
Message-ID: <537@inuxm.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 8-Apr-87 07:46:58 EST
Article-I.D.: inuxm.537
Posted: Wed Apr  8 07:46:58 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Apr-87 06:34:39 EST
References: <245000005@orstcs>
Organization: AT&T Consumer Products, Indianapolis
Lines: 27

> 
> 
> I have an associate who wants to do some "light-duty" control
> programming in Pascal for an old Z80 machine he has lying around.
> It runs CP/M 2.2.  Are there any suggestions from the crowd regarding
> what would be a good choice here?  I know about DRI's Pascal MT+.
> I have used it and won't recommend that.  Does Turbo-pascal still
> exist for cp/m?
> 
> Direct all responses to me by mail, please.  Thanks for the help.
> ...!hplabs!!hp-pcd!orstcs!go   (Gary Oliver)

Turbo Pascal is the premier choice, in my opinion.  I have two
C compilers, a Basic interpreter/compiler, and other stuff.
Turbo Pascal is what I use exclusively.

Why?  SPEED!  I don't have to exit the editor, start the compiler,
run the assembler, then the linker, then pop back in the editor to
fix a bug.  It's all there in one integrated environment.

Two months ago I finally bought a clone of an IBM AT.  So, the CP/M
system just sits there.  Anyway, the first program I got for my AT
was Turbo Pascal.

Stephen Hoskins
AT&T Consumer Electronics Laboratories
Indianapolis, Indiana