Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!ritcv!tropix!mjl
From: mjl@tropix.UUCP (Mike Lutz)
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix
Subject: Re: Disk Scheduling
Message-ID: <255@tropix.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 22-Mar-87 15:51:26 EST
Article-I.D.: tropix.255
Posted: Sun Mar 22 15:51:26 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Mar-87 01:16:49 EST
References: <236@inuxf.UUCP> <108@illusion.UUCP> <5004@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU> <7740@utzoo.UUCP> <520@gec-mi-at.co.uk>
Reply-To: mjl@tropix.UUCP (Mike Lutz)
Organization: GCA/Tropel Div. Rochester, NY 14450
Lines: 8

In article <520@gec-mi-at.co.uk> jgh@gec-mi-at.co.uk (Jeremy Harris) writes:
>Re: one-way and two-way elevator algorithms; has anybody any performance
>results for these two (actual or simulated)?

The only paper I know that did a performance study was:

Teory, T. J., and Pinkerton, T. B., "A Comparative Analysis of Disk
Scheduling Policies," CACM, vol. 15, no. 3 (Mar 1972), pp. 177-184.