Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!cmcl2!phri!roy From: roy@phri.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.mail.uucp,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: uucp source copyright status - IMPORTANT Message-ID: <2611@phri.UUCP> Date: Sun, 22-Mar-87 13:14:28 EST Article-I.D.: phri.2611 Posted: Sun Mar 22 13:14:28 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 25-Mar-87 01:23:28 EST References: <17953@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <696@brl-sem.ARPA> Reply-To: roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) Organization: Public Health Research Inst. (NY, NY) Lines: 16 Keywords: copyright uucp uucico Xref: utgpu comp.os.minix:443 comp.mail.uucp:344 comp.unix.wizards:1500 Summary: Aren't we all violating our licenses? In article <696@brl-sem.ARPA> ron@brl-sem.ARPA (Ron Natalie ) writes: > Once again, UNIX is protected by TRADE SECRET status. You may not divulge > the manner that UNIX works without being in violation of the agreement > you have with AT&T. Doesn't that mean that pretty much all of what is on unix-wizards is a violation of our license agreements? How many times have we seen somebody explain that X happens when you do Y because you zap the Z entry in the inode? If that's not divulging information about how Unix works internally, then I don't know what is. -- Roy Smith, {allegra,cmcl2,philabs}!phri!roy System Administrator, Public Health Research Institute 455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016 "you can't spell deoxyribonucleic without unix!"