Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!brl-adm!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!infotel!pollux!ti-csl!haddock From: haddock@ti-csl.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: uucp source copyright status - IMPORTANT Message-ID: <17638@ti-csl.CSNET> Date: Wed, 25-Mar-87 12:37:33 EST Article-I.D.: ti-csl.17638 Posted: Wed Mar 25 12:37:33 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 27-Mar-87 04:22:14 EST References: <480@gouldsd.UUCP> <43183@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV> Reply-To: haddock@tilde.UUCP (Rusty Haddock) Distribution: comp.os.minix Organization: TI Computer Science Center, Dallas Lines: 30 Keywords: copyright uucp uucico Xref: utgpu comp.os.minix:450 comp.mail.uucp:359 Summary: Kermit is not PUBLIC DOMAIN In article <2473@felix.UUCP> zemon@felix.UUCP (Art Zemon) writes: > >Why not give up on UUCP and write a replacement using the >Kermit protocol? Doing so wouldn't be much more work than >a small program which invokes C-Kermit instead of uucico >and Kermit really is public domain -- and well documented >and understood! >-- > -- Art Zemon Someone correct me if I'm wrong but it is my belief that Kermit is freely distributable but *NOT* Public Domain. Public domain means I can do ANYTHING I want with it INCLUDING selling it in part or in it entirety. Kermit, I believe, has a copyright from Columbia U. plus you need to sign an agreement with Columbia U if you want to use Kermit in a commercial product. Sorry, but I've seen this too many time to let it go by now. -Rusty- ================================================================ Rusty Haddock +++ Texas Instruments, Inc. +++ Dallas, Texas Computer Science Center, CRD&E +++ CSNET: Haddock@TI-CSL USENET: {ut-sally!im4u,convex!smu,sun!texsun}!ti-csl!haddock -- ================================================================ Rusty Haddock +++ Texas Instruments, Inc. +++ Dallas, Texas Computer Science Center, CRD&E +++ CSNET: Haddock@TI-CSL USENET: {ut-sally!im4u,convex!smu,sun!texsun}!ti-csl!haddock