Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!styx!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!cuae2!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.minix,comp.mail.uucp
Subject: Re: uucp source copyright status - IMPORTANT
Message-ID: <1643@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 31-Mar-87 18:45:32 EST
Article-I.D.: ttrdc.1643
Posted: Tue Mar 31 18:45:32 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Apr-87 06:29:38 EST
References: <480@gouldsd.UUCP> <43183@beno.seismo.CSS.GOV> <7319@boring.mcvax.cwi.nl>
Distribution: comp.os.minix
Organization: AT&T, Skokie, IL
Lines: 15
Keywords: copyright uucp uucico
Xref: utgpu comp.os.minix:468 comp.mail.uucp:388

In article <7319@boring.mcvax.cwi.nl>, jack@mcvax.cwi.nl (Jack Jansen) writes:
< The *only* things we need are a way to reach another system, and some
< way to get files across to it (with a reasonable guarantee that they
< will be the same after transmission:-).
< 
< This is *exactly* what most kermits are doing nowadays.

Can Kermit work auto-dialers and negotiate the login protocol?  Also--does
Kermit negotiate bad-data retry on a smaller scale than whole files?  Just
curious (I'm not a Kermit guru as you can plainly see).
-- 
|------------dan levy------------|  Path: ..!{akgua,homxb,ihnp4,ltuxa,mvuxa,
|         an engihacker @        |		vax135}!ttrdc!ttrda!levy
| at&t computer systems division |  Disclaimer:  try datclaimer.
|--------skokie, illinois--------|