Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!jade!eris!mwm From: mwm@eris.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Good values for addbuffers? Message-ID: <2951@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Fri, 27-Mar-87 19:27:42 EST Article-I.D.: jade.2951 Posted: Fri Mar 27 19:27:42 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 29-Mar-87 07:49:58 EST Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mwm@eris.BERKELEY.EDU (Mike (My watch has windows) Meyer) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 15 Given the way computer systems tend to behave, I wouldn't be surprised if there were some knees in the performance/buffers curve for the trackdisk.device. Since shortage of chip memory is always a problem, it'd be nice to know where they are. Has anyone done any tests on this, or does someone who knows the insides of the driver have any feel for where they ought to be? Thanx,