Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cbmvax!grr
From: grr@cbmvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: The Next Amiga
Message-ID: <1645@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 7-Apr-87 16:45:04 EST
Article-I.D.: cbmvax.1645
Posted: Tue Apr  7 16:45:04 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Apr-87 00:35:14 EST
References: <3367@udenva.UUCP> <6248@ukmj.ukma.ms.uky.csnet> <15999@amdcad.AMD.COM>
Reply-To: grr@cbmvax.UUCP (George Robbins)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 19

In article <15999@amdcad.AMD.COM> tim@amdcad.UUCP (Tim Olson) writes:
>In article <6248@ukmj.ukma.ms.uky.csnet> sean@ms.uky.csnet (Sean Casey) writes:
>>If Commodore really wants to STICK IT to Apple and IBM, they should develop a
>>68030 machine, not 68020.  Put a 64K cache on it and let it scream.  I don't
>>care if the graphics are better.  Unix at 6-8 MIPS would sell a lot of Amigas.
>
>Better yet, leap-frog *everyone* and put in an Am29000.  While all of
>the others are getting their 20% performance advantage over the 68020 by
>redesigning with the '030, we could be running our ray-tracers at 15 X
>VAX 11-780 speed ;-)
>
>	Tim (just dreamin' out loud) Olson Advanced Micro Devices

Send samples to George Robbins c/o Commodore Business Machines 1200 Wilson Dr
West Chester PA  19380.   8-)   (I guess).
-- 
George Robbins - now working for,	uucp: {ihnp4|seismo|rutgers}!cbmvax!grr
but no way officially representing	arpa: cbmvax!grr@seismo.css.GOV
Commodore, Engineering Department	fone: 215-431-9255 (only by moonlite)