Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!dayton!viper!john
From: john@viper.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: uniterm size
Message-ID: <812@viper.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 10-Apr-87 23:24:42 EST
Article-I.D.: viper.812
Posted: Fri Apr 10 23:24:42 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 12-Apr-87 00:43:58 EST
References: <282@tutor.tut.UUCP> <4468@utah-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@viper.UUCP (John Stanley)
Distribution: comp
Organization: DynaSoft Systems
Lines: 23

In article <4468@utah-cs.UUCP> sandra@utah-cs.UUCP (Sandra J Loosemore) writes:
 >Rather than all argue about what options we find useful and which ones
 >we don't, how about making all of these options, well, optional?  This is
 >how we handled the extras in MicroGnuEmacs.  In the machine-specific
 >include file, there are about a half dozen things that you can #define
 >or not, that control whether or not certain features are compiled in.  
 ......
 >
 >-Sandra Loosemore
 >(sandra@utah-cs.uucp, sandra@cs.utah.edu)

  Not a bad idea Sandra IFF the sources were being passed around.  Last
time I checked, Uniterm was a binary-only distribution product.  Unless
I'm mistaken, the author wants it to remain that way.  (I, for one am
greatful enough to have the program in the first place.  I don't plan
on pestering him for the source...  If he had wanted to give it out, I
suspect we would have it already and this entire discussion would't
exist..)

--- 
John Stanley (john@viper.UUCP)
Software Consultant - DynaSoft Systems
UUCP: ...{amdahl,ihnp4,rutgers}!{meccts,dayton}!viper!john