Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-lcc!ptsfa!ihnp4!homxb!houxm!hjuxa!pzl
From: pzl@hjuxa.UUCP (Mister Rem)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple,comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.att,misc.kids
Subject: Re: SAT Practice Software Recommendations?
Message-ID: <653@hjuxa.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 19-Mar-87 09:43:11 EST
Article-I.D.: hjuxa.653
Posted: Thu Mar 19 09:43:11 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 21-Mar-87 05:48:02 EST
References: <865@mtunb.UUCP> <343@houxa.UUCP> <2189@calmasd.GE.COM>
Distribution: na
Organization: dis organization
Lines: 14
Xref: mnetor comp.sys.apple:887 comp.sys.ibm.pc:2605 comp.sys.att:275 misc.kids:918

In article <2189@calmasd.GE.COM>, jnp@calmasd.GE.COM (John Pantone) writes:
> Maybe I full of beans - but how can you effectively study for an
> Aptitude test?  Oh sure, you could become more comfortable with the
> "style" and format of the test, but improving your aptitude ??
> 

	Well, I took the SATS, got a respectable set of scores,
	then took a workbook/instructor SAT prep course
	which was basically lectures on the intent of the questions,
	and piles of examples... Then I retook the SATs (about 3 monthes later)
	and got a combined ~200 more points!
	Familiarity with the types of test questions definately
	helps your score. (I don't think I improved my "aptitude", 
	my score went up though)