Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!necntc!ames!oliveb!intelca!clif
From: clif@intelca.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.m68k,comp.sys.intel
Subject: Re: Re: Recent Motorola ad seen in Byte
Message-ID: <2575@intelca.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 7-Apr-87 14:19:44 EST
Article-I.D.: intelca.2575
Posted: Tue Apr  7 14:19:44 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Apr-87 00:36:24 EST
References: <362@sbcs.UUCP> <1466@ncr-sd.SanDiego.NCR.COM> <580@plx.UUCP> <21@cipric.UUCP> <2663@yale-celed.yale.UUCP>
Distribution: comp
Organization: Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
Lines: 27
Xref: utgpu comp.sys.m68k:312 comp.sys.intel:130

> In article <21@cipric.UUCP> dad@cipric.UUCP (Dan A. Dickey) writes:
> >Thought some of you out there might be interested in this...I ran the
> >drystone benchmarks on an Intel 80386 Multibus II system (which by the
> >way is running AT&T S5R3), and got:
> >	5882 dryr
> >	5376 drynr
> 
> I'm assuming that this is with a 16 MHz clock.  With a 20 Mhz clock these
> numbers would go up by 25% giving even more impressive results.
> 
> 			Jim Brayton
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> brayton@yale.UUCP					brayton@yale.ARPA	
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Those numbers are also using PCC compiler, a good optimizing Compiler
like Green Hill's C 1.8.2G or Metaware C-386 1.3 increase these times
by additional 15-20%.  


-- 
Clif Purkiser, Intel, Santa Clara, Ca.
{pur-ee,hplabs,amd,scgvaxd,dual,idi,omsvax}!intelca!clif

These views are my own property.  However anyone who wants them can have 
them for a nominal fee.