Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!sri-unix!hplabs!cae780!amdcad!dopey!jimb
From: jimb@dopey.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: An SE Owner's Comments (sorry)
Message-ID: <325@dopey.AMD.COM>
Date: Thu, 26-Mar-87 15:28:20 EST
Article-I.D.: dopey.325
Posted: Thu Mar 26 15:28:20 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Mar-87 06:05:56 EST
References: <1365@tekig4.TEK.COM> <321@dopey.AMD.COM>
Reply-To: jimb@dopey.AMD.COM (Jim Budler)
Distribution: world
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Sunnyvale, Ca.
Lines: 27
Keywords: obnoxious

In article <321@dopey.AMD.COM> jimb@dopey.AMD.COM (Jim Budler) writes:
+---------------
| >In article <1365@tekig4.TEK.COM) bradn@tekig4.UUCP (Bradford Needham) writes:
| >)Did all you Mac+ owners notice that the SE (and Mac II)'s 256K Rom will never
| >)be put in Mac+'s?  Now you know what us "obsolete" old Rom owners have felt
| >)like for the past year.  I hope the experience makes a few die-hard technoids
| >)realize that owners of old equipment are not stupid, poverty-stricken, or
| >)backward.
| >
| >Obnoxious.
| >
| >Comparing the $300 investment I took to go from old to new ROM to the
| >$2000+ investment I must take to go to the SE.
| >
| >If you could afford the upgrade to the new ROMs, and didn't, the words
| >stupid and backward might apply. 
| >
+---------------

My apologies to the net, 64K ROM owners in particular.


-- 
+===== Jim Budler ==== Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. ==== (408) 749-5806 =====+
|  Compuserve: 72415,1200; Delphi: JIMBUDLER;  Usenet: jimb@amdcad.AMD.COM   |
+==== Disclaimer: My company wouldn't let ME speak for them, would they? ====+
Who needs four?