Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!lll-lcc!ptsfa!ihnp4!homxb!gemini
From: gemini@homxb.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Availability of LIB or ARC software
Message-ID: <164@homxb.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Mar-87 03:03:40 EST
Article-I.D.: homxb.164
Posted: Tue Mar 24 03:03:40 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 26-Mar-87 00:49:52 EST
References: <2802@well.UUCP> <205700001@mirror>
Organization: PC Research, Inc.
Lines: 7
Summary: Seems wasteful

In article <205700001@mirror>, rs@mirror.UUCP writes:
> Don't bother asking mod.sources archive sites for ARC -- it was never
> published there, and as long as it's shareware, and I am the moderator,
> it never will be.

Publishing shareware source code in mod.sources seems to me like an
overall win for Usenet in terms of reducing traffic.  What's the beef?