Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!GRINNELL.MAILNET!McGuire_Ed
From: McGuire_Ed@GRINNELL.MAILNET.UUCP
Newsgroups: mod.computers.vax
Subject: RE: more OPCOM...
Message-ID: <8703030024.AA24266@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Mon, 2-Mar-87 13:07:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8703030024.AA24266
Posted: Mon Mar  2 13:07:00 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 3-Mar-87 21:40:23 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 14
Approved: info-vax@sri-kl.arpa

>By my reasoning, if there is no terminal that has TAPES enabled on the system,
>shouldn't that user get some sort of error message?  And when the operator
>is there and has enabled TAPES, they will get the request and mount the
>tape?

I remember playing with this in the past.  It seems to me that I eventually
found that there _was_ a terminal with TAPES enabled.  I believe it was the
system console on a different cluster node.  The only thing I'm not certain
of is that it was the TAPES operator being queried.  It _may_ have been
another operator class.

Ed McGuire
Grinnell College
MCGUIRE@GRIN2.BITNET