Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!NRTC-GREMLIN.ARPA!mrose From: mrose@NRTC-GREMLIN.ARPA (Marshall Rose) Newsgroups: mod.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: A defense of GOSIP Message-ID: <21718.542829929@nrtc-gremlin.arpa> Date: Sun, 15-Mar-87 13:26:15 EST Article-I.D.: nrtc-gre.21718.542829929 Posted: Sun Mar 15 13:26:15 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 16-Mar-87 04:07:54 EST References: <8703150317.AA06298@bu-cs.bu.edu> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 41 Approved: tcp-ip@sri-nic.arpa > (maybe we should continue this argument on INFO-OSI which no doubt > everyone reads on their X.400/OSI systems anyhow.) Nah. As has been pointed out in the past by Jon, these guys don't even use computers. Seriously, it's the stupidest catch-22 I've ever heard of: you can't start an electronic mail interest group for use by OSI zealots because either: - they don't have working X.400 systems - their systems don't talk to each other yet - they won't agree to use one organization's system for political reasons - they won't use the ARPAnet mailsystem (even though they probably all could get legitimate access) because even though it works it's not OSI and they can't use it 'cause that would be admitting that the ARPAnet stuff works You think I'm kidding, I'm not! This has happened to two or three times to my knowledge, and quite frankly I'm not even tied in that well to the OSI bunch. Of course the gag is that any of these four problems can be "fixed" easily: - you can now get X.400 systems on just about every machine you listed (true!) except perhaps the lisp engines - they could connect up to a common carrier - they could grow up - they could grow up and admit that, for the moment, TCP/IP and the ARPAnet works much better than OSI does. Croissants or donuts? I'd settle for hot water! /mtr ps: I'm out the door for the Monterey conference, so my responses to everyone's flames/cheers will be delayed by a few days...