Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ukma!sean
From: sean@ukma.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: .signature line limit
Message-ID: <6213@ukmj.ukma.ms.uky.csnet>
Date: Mon, 30-Mar-87 20:12:21 EST
Article-I.D.: ukmj.6213
Posted: Mon Mar 30 20:12:21 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 1-Apr-87 05:00:34 EST
References: <1305@msudoc.UUCP>
Sender: news@ukma.ms.uky.csnet
Reply-To: sean@ukmj.ms.uky.csnet (Sean Casey)
Organization: The Leaning Tower of Patterson Office @ The Univ. of KY
Lines: 18

In article <1305@msudoc.UUCP> lawitzke@msudoc.UUCP (John Lawitzke) writes:
> think a 5-line limit is far more realistic:
>
>I think this is far better than the four line limit. Perhaps a poll is
>in order to see how people feel of 4 vs 5. I volunteer to collect the
>votes and post the results.

I agree.  I recieved no poll as to how many lines a signature could be, nor
was I asked about the 50% rule.  If Usenet is to remain true to it's concept,
these decisions need to be made by asking the people, not by a few who decide
that this is the best way to do things.

Sean
-- 
===========================================================================
Sean Casey      UUCP:  cbosgd!ukma!sean           CSNET:  sean@ms.uky.csnet
		ARPA:  ukma!sean@anl-mcs.arpa    BITNET:  sean@UKMA.BITNET
Copyright (C) 1987 Sean Casey, restricted redistribution prohibited.