Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!aramis!paul!dpz
From: dpz@paul.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: .signature line limit
Message-ID: <338@john.paul.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Sat, 4-Apr-87 00:01:55 EST
Article-I.D.: john.338
Posted: Sat Apr  4 00:01:55 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 5-Apr-87 07:34:17 EST
References: <1305@msudoc.UUCP> <12703@vuwcomp.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 12

> From: newbery@vuwcomp.UUCP (Michael Newbery)

> Why not a character limit, say 256? This is actually less than four 80
> character lines but allows more flexibility in my opinion. The aim of the
> .signature restriction is to save bytes is it not?

I get the feeling this whole discussion is really not to save bytes,
but some higher cosmic purpose.

					dpz
-- 
     David P. Zimmerman     rutgers!dpz     dpz@rutgers.edu