Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!cblpf!cbstr1!Karl.Kleinpaste
From: Karl.Kleinpaste@cbstr1.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: Suggestion for automatic Followup-To:
Message-ID: <211@cbstr1.att.com>
Date: Thu, 9-Apr-87 09:14:02 EST
Article-I.D.: cbstr1.211
Posted: Thu Apr  9 09:14:02 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 11-Apr-87 11:39:28 EST
References: <207@cbstr1.att.com> <18246@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Sender: karl@cbstr1.att.com
Distribution: world
Lines: 12
Summary: No?
In-reply-to: fair@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU's message of 9 Apr 87 01:39:37 GMT
Posting-Front-End: GNU Emacs 18.41.1 of Mon Mar 30 1987 on cbstr1 (usg-unix-v)

fair@ucbarpa.Berkeley.EDU writes:
   I still think that there are discussions that should be
   cross-posted en toto.

I'm just curious: What sorts of discussions do you think belong in
more than 1 newsgroup?  I ask because you're the first person to
suggest that it was an all-around bad idea; I have a small army of
positive responses in my mail, with a couple caveats about it (e.g.,
notes interface complications).  But this is the first outright
complaint I've seen.

Karl