Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!ut-sally!nather
From: nather@ut-sally.UUCP
Newsgroups: sci.bio,sci.astro
Subject: Re: Mass extinctions (atmospheric energy balance)
Message-ID: <7698@ut-sally.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 2-Apr-87 10:47:07 EST
Article-I.D.: ut-sally.7698
Posted: Thu Apr  2 10:47:07 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Apr-87 12:54:06 EST
References: <6760@alice.uUCp> <496@uokmax.UUCP> <1682@whuts.UUCP> <1140@ames.UUCP>
Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas
Lines: 10
Keywords: green house and nuclear winter
Xref: utgpu sci.bio:213 sci.astro:792

Many thanks for the explanation.

I have a question, though --- did the rotation of the planet on its own
axis get lost in the simplification process, or do the models ignore it?

-- 
Ed Nather
Astronomy Dept, U of Texas @ Austin
{allegra,ihnp4}!{noao,ut-sally}!utastro!nather
nather@astro.AS.UTEXAS.EDU