Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watnot!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ucbvax!vuwcomp.UUCP!steve From: steve@vuwcomp.UUCP.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.ai.digest Subject: Military Funding Message-ID: <8704050628.AA10981@vuwcomp> Date: Sun, 5-Apr-87 01:28:07 EST Article-I.D.: vuwcomp.8704050628.AA10981 Posted: Sun Apr 5 01:28:07 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 15-Apr-87 03:08:36 EST References: <[A.ISI.EDU]31-Mar-87.15:25:11.DAVSMITH> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: vuwcomp!steve (Steve Cassidy) Distribution: world Organization: Comp Sci, Victoria Univ, Wellington, New Zealand Lines: 23 Approved: ailist@stripe.sri.com Summary: Military Research In article <[A.ISI.EDU]31-Mar-87.15:25:11.DAVSMITH> DAVSMITH@A.ISI.EDU writes: >Without the military applications, who in the commercial sector >would attempt to put together cooperating expert systems >in real-time? [ One could broaden the issue and ask >"Who in their right mind would..?"] Here we assume that the only *possible* applications of real-time cooperating ES are military ones. What is the major difference between a system which sits in a fighter plane monitoring the pilots actions and one which sits in some complex manufacturing plant monitoring the processes there? Too often military research is justified as the only way new ideas can develop, the truth is that they are the only research programmes given sufficient funds to develop new ideas. If research groups had the same level of funding available for civil projects then they would be able to develop real-time cooperative expert systems in domains which may actually be *useful* to mankind. Steve ACSnet: steve@vuwcomp.nz UUCP: {ubc-vision,alberta}!calgary!vuwcomp!steve