Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!bu-cs!kwe From: kwe@bu-cs.BU.EDU (kwe@buit1.bu.edu (Kent W. England)) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Subject: Re: Thin Ethernet/Coax Message-ID: <6469@bu-cs.BU.EDU> Date: Mon, 13-Apr-87 13:26:24 EST Article-I.D.: bu-cs.6469 Posted: Mon Apr 13 13:26:24 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 18-Apr-87 18:45:15 EST References: <2925@ptsfa.UUCP> Reply-To: kwe@buit13.UUCP (Kent England) Organization: Boston Univ. Information Tech. Dept. Lines: 30 Keywords: Thin-Ethernet Coax RG58 RG59 Summary: Why ask for trouble? In article <2925@ptsfa.UUCP> jmc@ptsfa.UUCP (Jerry Carlin) writes: > >We want to hook up a SUN 3/50 workstation in a cubicle that is wired >for RG-59 coax and our thin ethernet is RG-58. We therefore have a >impedance mismatch since one coax is 50 ohm and the other is 75 ohm. >Someone told us that if the distances were small we could ignore >the mismatch. > Why ask for trouble? If the distance is short, then the thin cable shouldn't cost too much (that's where the "cheap" moniker came from). How are you going to keep track of this kludge so that two years from now and two dozen more workstations from now you will be able to figure where this new glitch is coming from. Visibility into this level (the physical) from your system is tough. These mismatch problems are subtle. It may work now, but I guarantee it won't work later. Save yourself trouble later and install thin cable. Better yet, get thin cable installed once and for all, if you are going the thin route. Save the RG-59 for Gilligan's Island reruns. -- -------------------------------------------- | Kent W. England | | Network & Systems Engineering Group | | Boston University | | Information Technology | | 111 Cummington Street | | Boston, MA 02215 | | (617) 353-2780 | | kwe@buit1.bu.edu internet | | itkwe@bostonu BITNET | --------------------------------------------