Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!seismo!ll-xn!ames!pioneer!lamaster
From: lamaster@pioneer.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans
Subject: Re: ethernet terminal servers
Message-ID: <1460@ames.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 5-May-87 19:22:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: ames.1460
Posted: Tue May  5 19:22:01 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 7-May-87 04:11:08 EDT
References: <45800001@uicsrd>
Sender: usenet@ames.UUCP
Reply-To: lamaster@pioneer.UUCP (Hugh LaMaster)
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
Lines: 29

In article <45800001@uicsrd> kai@uicsrd.CSRD.UIUC.EDU writes:
>
>How do different Ethernet terminal servers affect network performance,
>user-perceived responce time (especially for editing), network
>management, and the company bank statement?
>
>Patrick Wol{e


We have been testing an Encore Annex terminal server here at Ames.  It works
very well, and is very conveniently arranged (auto reboot,
nameserver, domain name server, rwho, rlogin ,telnet, etc.)  In my personal
experience, it is a very good choice.  (naturally, your milage may vary, etc.)






  Hugh LaMaster, m/s 233-9,  UUCP {seismo,topaz,lll-crg,ucbvax}!
  NASA Ames Research Center                ames!pioneer!lamaster
  Moffett Field, CA 94035    ARPA lamaster@ames-pioneer.arpa
  Phone:  (415)694-6117      ARPA lamaster@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov

"In order to promise genuine progress, the acronym RISC should stand 
for REGULAR (not reduced) instruction set computer." - Wirth

("Any opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the
author and do not represent the opinions of NASA or the U.S. Government")