Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!cos.UUCP!howard From: howard@cos.UUCP (Howard C. Berkowitz) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Submission for mod.telecom (Modems and data jacks) Message-ID: <207@cos.COM> Date: Wed, 22-Apr-87 14:00:07 EST Article-I.D.: cos.207 Posted: Wed Apr 22 14:00:07 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Apr-87 13:20:49 EST References: <8704111730.AA04601@seismo.CSS.GOV> <8704162250.AA22899@cognito.sun.com> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: Corporation for Open Systems, McLean, VA Lines: 41 Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu I do want to emphasize that it's bad practice to transmit at a higher level than that which is designed for a local loop; it's quite accurate that louder is not always better -- but it is important to be loud enough. The worst horror story I've heard on excessive level, which may be apocryphal: An [unnamed by my informant in DATEC] user called his telephone test board for a problem with the remote site's Bell 829 data auxiliary set. [This is an interface device, for Telco use, which has a tone-operated loopback feature]. The user complained that the unit would not go into loopback. Now, 829's are for telco use, not customer. Most telcos are happy, however, to let customers use them for fault isolation. The 829 is put into loopback with at least a 1-second application of 2713 Hz tone. In the story, the helpful test board tried to loop back the 829 in question. It worked perfectly, but the user couldn't get it to loop. The test board then asked the customer to describe exactly what he was doing; the answer was "oh, I send out 2600 Hz at a good hot +10-20 dBm -- the limiter drops it to a legal level." Horrified silence from test board. A mystery of the last week just resolved. Over the past week or so, the telco had been installing a new electronic switch in its central office, a switch equipped with toll fraud detection. "Blue Box" fraud uses a 2600 Hz tone; somehow, the user assumed this was the loopback frequency. Because the user 2600 tone went out at an extremely high level, it crosstalked a large number of pairs in its cable. The new switch kept reporting massive simultaneous toll fraud attempts (i.e., pure 2600 on a subscriber loop), a sufficiently large number that equipment failure was assumed. The switch had been torn down repeatedly to find out why it assumed massive toll fraud was in process.