Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!DECWRL.DEC.COM!daemon From: daemon@DECWRL.DEC.COM (The devil himself) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Submission for comp-dcom-telecom Message-ID: <8704302253.AA01113@decwrl.dec.com> Date: Thu, 30-Apr-87 18:53:37 EDT Article-I.D.: decwrl.8704302253.AA01113 Posted: Thu Apr 30 18:53:37 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 3-May-87 09:21:19 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 41 Approved: telecom@xx.lcs.mit.edu Path: decwrl!delni.dec.com!goldstein From: goldstein@delni.dec.com (Fred R. Goldstein dtn226-7388) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Intra-LATA toll gougine; Area Codes Message-ID: <9595@decwrl.DEC.COM> Date: 30 Apr 87 22:53:31 GMT Sender: daemon@decwrl.DEC.COM Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation Lines: 31 Re: last issue's flame about how high intra-LATA rates are in Virginia vs. AT&T; That's entirely a state matter and has nothing to do with competition, period. Intra-LATA INTRASTATE calls are priced per rates set by the state govt. These rates vary hugely state to state; NJ's, for example, are maybe half most other states'. This isn't the phone company gouging because of their monopoly, it's the state regulator's way of subsidizing cheap local residential service. Toll calls are viewed as a luxury, local lines as a necessity, so the former pay for the latter. The FCC has taken steps to reduce this subsidy within their domain, INTERSTATE calls, by using "access charges" (really a local service charge) to make up for money formerly paid via toll cross-subsidization. Some states have also moved closer to cost-based pricing. New England Telephone lowered its toll rates too, to face perceived (not very real) threats of competition, but the Mass. DPU happens to believe in cost-based (honest) rates. Most states don't; keeping "basic" rates low is (perceived as) better politics. If you had competition, the competitors would still be obligated to pay outrageous charges to the local company to contribute their share of the subsidy. That still occurs with the MCIs of the world. A lot of what they collect goes right back to pay for local service. Re: Area code 413. Someone pointed out, I think in this digest last year, that 413 (a handful of phones in the unpopulated boondocks of Western Mass.) was one of the first area codes cut into service, during the trial phase of DDD. Thus it got a "good" code and a small geographic area, since they helped the test. History bites back... fred (whose office will soon be in NPA 508, but home is still 617)